you can't use men to sell things. women are objects; men are consumers; it'd be a weird freaky mismatch if there was some bald dude in a flannel shirt on your desktop. but when i design a computer that is totally what it will have.
Why would this picture be off-putting for female customers? I'm happy to get on my feminist soapbox willy-nilly and at the slightest provocation these days (ranting is excellent when procrastinating) but am hard pressed to find this picture offensive. I t
Oh, I agree that her features are oversexualised, it was just that the image was introduced as 'dauntingly heterosexual' which I don't think is necessarily the case - I believe a homosexual female has commented that she finds the image pleasant enough :)
But then I think about sexuality is something that's always evolving, changing. I'm sick of the binary thinking in terms of sexuality; straight/gay. There's so much more in between.
I find her a bit creepy, but is just having a female image really a sign of heterosexuality? Would a male image be a definite sign of homosexuality? It's just a human image who happens to be female.
42 Comments
Realtime comments disabled
sSsStephensonNn 1172 days ago
SCARY!!! :S
alecwills 1173 days ago
She's just finished spaghetti and the strain has caused her iris to go purple
IanBHunter 1174 days ago
intheradiator - I get the feeling you've half read the 'idiots guide to psychology'
intheradiator 1174 days ago
you can't use men to sell things. women are objects; men are consumers; it'd be a weird freaky mismatch if there was some bald dude in a flannel shirt on your desktop. but when i design a computer that is totally what it will have.
happeningfish 1174 days ago
perhaps more like dauntingly cosplay and Elfstones of Shannara, perhaps.
IanBHunter 1174 days ago
I think she's whistling 'Colonel Bogey'.
ruleistherule 1174 days ago
it's only heterosexual if you're a dude. funny mouth shape, though. blow-up doll?
jimeikner 1174 days ago
Definitely belongs on black velvet...
Diableret 1174 days ago
I hope its not like maya. i spent last semester at uni battling with autodesk maya...
spotrick 1175 days ago
Photoshopped. ;)
SnarksAndSparks 1175 days ago
Why would this picture be off-putting for female customers? I'm happy to get on my feminist soapbox willy-nilly and at the slightest provocation these days (ranting is excellent when procrastinating) but am hard pressed to find this picture offensive. I t
arprice 1175 days ago
It's sexy. Perhaps that's the image they were after.
RantsTheDog 1175 days ago
Christ, can see what you mean by 'dauntingly heterosexual'. Do they not want female customers?
_parallelogram_ 1175 days ago
Oh, I agree that her features are oversexualised, it was just that the image was introduced as 'dauntingly heterosexual' which I don't think is necessarily the case - I believe a homosexual female has commented that she finds the image pleasant enough :)
nongenderous 1175 days ago
But then I think about sexuality is something that's always evolving, changing. I'm sick of the binary thinking in terms of sexuality; straight/gay. There's so much more in between.
nongenderous 1175 days ago
No, it's more the posture of the face was just thinking; "objectified again!"; the big, pouting lips. Would rather see something more gender neutral.
_parallelogram_ 1175 days ago
I find her a bit creepy, but is just having a female image really a sign of heterosexuality? Would a male image be a definite sign of homosexuality? It's just a human image who happens to be female.
nongenderous 1175 days ago
Doesn't Apple want any female costumers? *coughsexismcough*
IanBHunter 1175 days ago
It's like walking into an 'Athena' shop back in the 90's
HamzaRehman 1175 days ago
hey i know her ... she's republican. except the mole. bill's an animal!